Tag Archives: La Raza

Rape Tree Idiot’s Psychotic Temper Tantrum

My last Post  Rape Tree Idiots  rebutted a delusional poster who equated rapes on illegal alien smuggling routes with debauchery at luxury ski resorts. Instead of a civilized response, the author posted this on her website, also saying that she doubted I would approve it from moderation here. Normally I delete comments containing vulgarities, but this person’s comment says so much about her that I am posting it so you can all see the character of people who attempt to play down the horrors of illegal immigration and generally criticise laws and law enforcement. Here is her temper tantrum:

__________________

Because my comment is awaiting moderation at her site and I’m not sure that it’ll be published, here’s my response to Ruthtalks.

Dear sister,

Your rebuttal was entertaining but I must ask, “Are you listening to too much Rush?” A few items of note:

1) I didn’t compare the route of an illegal alien to a ski resort. I was poking fun of the idiot in a You Tube video who said wrongly that women don’t show their underwear.

2) Where in the world would you get the idea I’m a progressive liberal? While it’s truly none of your fucking business, I’m what would be called classically liberal or a Goldwater conservative. If you don’t know what that means, perhaps you should turn off the idiot box and pick up a book.

3) Nothing in my post glamorized criminal activity. Now that I think of it, perhaps you aren’t yet ready for a book. Learn to read.

4) Show me the law enforcement files. All I’ve seen on the subject comes from one of two sources. The first being neo-con border nazis with an agenda or the human rights suppressor masquerading as bringer of equality called the UN. That the WSJ or NYT picks up an article based on those sources does not prove anything. Here’s an interesting source on trafficking. Get somebody to help you read it; you might learn something.

5) I am a female and you’d have known that if you’d read my post with a critical mind rather than knee-jerk haughtiness. Generalizations such as yours underscore the point of my post.

Of course, based on your poorly written rebuttal, I don’t suspect that you possess the capability to understand any of this comment.

___________________

Wow! Civilized discourse, where art thou? This looks more like a temper tantrum of a jerk infuriated that a serious author exposed her lack of the ability for rational thought.

Item 1. “I didn’t compare the route of illegal alien to a ski resort.” You write many words, but you need to work on logic. The overriding logical proposition of your offfending article, once one strips out the excess verbiage, is to deny the existence of Rape Trees because you saw bras in trees at luxury resorts. If you cannot understand what you wrote, our schools are in real trouble.

Consider this contradiction in her lies: After she says “none of your f—-ing business” shes lies that she is a Goldwater Conservative!” Why do we know this is a lie?

Because in Item 4 she uses the two terms “neo-con border nazi” and “human rights suppressor” in reference to authors who decry the Rape Trees and illegal alien smuggling! Barry Goldwater would never say that.

Does anyone doubt that Barry Goldwater would be raising hell about the Rape Trees? Instead of denying their existence by references to  bras in trees at luxury resorts? 

In contrast, the entire theme of her original post was that bras in trees on illegal alien smuggling routes cannot possibly be described as Rape Trees because there are bras in trees at luxury ski resorts and in the rafters of grossly tasteless restaurants with vulgar names. But of course she has shown that she likes vulgarity.

Item 3. “Nothing in my post glamorized criminal activity.” When you dispute the existence of Rape Trees by reference to debauchery in luxury ski resorts, that is implied glorification of the illegal aliens smuggling and the rapes committed therein.

Silly Lying Liberal, your entire lengthy post is entirely in defiance of logic and in defiance of the facts.

Item 4. “All I’ve seen on the subject comes from one of two sources.” Haa! First, this implies you did not bother to read your second source! Second, you threw a temper tantrum laced with (A) vulgarities and (B) ad hominem personal insults (neither of which are acceptable in public blogging) because a logical and well researched author disputes your misinterpretation of what you admit to be your only source, since you say you only used one source!

Perhaps if you did serious research using more than one source you (A) would not have committed your errors of fact and logic, and (B) would not insult serious authors whose only offense is exposing how your biases and delusions warp your perception of reality.

Please understand, this is not meant as an insult, but as a diagnosis. You are seriously out of touch with reality. If you decline emotional help, at least read a book or two on how to perform serious journalistic research including “representative sourcing” which is different from selecting only a single source that support one’s own delusions biases, and another on logic.

Since you speak of my comment as “entertaining,” perhaps you might be entertained by reviewing a comment from others on your own post:

Useful idiots”

This saying is much older than 1980s, it originates from Lenin who was describing idealists in the West (such as GB Shaw) helping Soviet propaganda in the 1920s and 30s. It is a phrase well known and casually used in ex-communist countries.”

Perhaps you might ruminate about whether your are a “Useful Idiot.”

 

Finally, I canot resist a comment on the dishonesty of extreme liberal progressives:

As part of the Karl Marx/George Soros/Bill Ayres/Barack Obama style of subversion, extremists are instructed to disguise themselves. Nobody in America will admit to being a Communist or the equivalent: an extreme liberal progressive.

This strategy is intended to deceive the public into thinking that the most extreme propaganda is not extreme, but to falsely think it is mainstream because the subversives lie and say they are “independents” or “conservatives” or even “Goldwater Conservatives.”  Then they deny the existence of Rape Trees because they wish to increase illegal immigration, with the concurrent drug smuggling, rape trees, sexual slavery and infiltration of terrorists.

 

Fortunately most Useful Idiots are also idiots, and give themselves away by using terms that my opponent did: she uses the two terms “neo-con border nazi” and “human rights suppressor” which are in direct contradiction to her lie that she is a Goldwater Conservative. In her original post she even promotes legalization of drugs.

The truth will set you free, unless you are psychotic or liberal progressive, in which case you cannot distinguish between reality and biased delusions.

Rape Trees and Idiots Out Of Touch With Real World

A recent post demonstrated how progressive liberals are able to completely disconnect from reality for the purpose of  letting their biases completely warp their interpretation of anything in conflict with their biases. In the  illustrative post the author observes that ladies’  women’s undergarments can be found in trees at ski resorts. Therefore, this liberal progressive concludes that finding women’s undergarments in trees on illegal alien human smugging routes cannot be considered evidence of rape trees.

The biased author writes:

That idea that some women are raped while attempting to cross the border should never be discounted; I don’t doubt there is rape and other violence in some situations. The idea of panties in trees being proof of widespread rape is what is laughable. The conjectures without victims, witnesses or other proof make a mockery of the very real subject of abuse and the people who copy and paste such nonsense in blog posts are either well meaning idiots or idiots with an agenda, but idiots nonetheless.”

The reality is that the victims, witnesses and other proof are widespread throughout court and law enforcement files in every major city in America. This psychotic liberal progressive chooses to ignore the widespread existence of evidence disproving his delusional ravings.

Legitimate formal law enforcement files, not neo-con blogs as the liberal progressive offending author claims, are filled with sworn statements of women who have been raped during illegal alien smuggling treks, corroborated by sworn statements of the rape victims husbands and children. Police in every major city in America consistently, and constantly, arrest illegal aliens operating brothels filled with sex slaves imported via the Southern smuggling routes. These sex slaves typically report that they were gang raped and their undergarments hung in a boastful rape tree.

To repeat, in hopes that hopelessly biased liberal progressives might comprehend reality, this information is not from neo-con blogs, but from law enforcement files. In addition, these police reports are published nationwide in almost every major metropolitan newspaper, all of which are liberal publications, not neo-cons as the offending post suggests.

One might interpret the offending post as an attempt to glorify and justify the criminal activity of smuggling illegal aliens as part of a broader La Raza campaign to increase the flow of illegal aliens by falsely misleading the public into thinking that the horrific abuses on the smuggling routes are instead no different than sexual misconduct under the glamour of ski resorts. Idiocy!

How could any none-biased person equate smuggling routes with the debauchery at ski resorts? Young people who have been spoiled with more wealth and leisure than brains take ski resort vacations costing thousands of dollars to indulge in “look at me” sports, wet T-shirt contests in bars, and debauchery both indoors and outdoors, all as part of sybaritic luxurious self-indulgence.

In total contrast, the psychological environment of the illegal alien smuggling routes is abuse, fear and desperation. The cartels and “coyotes” herding the illegal aliens are all armed and vicious. Literally every day of the year, for many years, at least one more dead body of the illegal aliens is found in the deserts.

What kind of psychotic delusion of liberal progressive bias is required to equate the death, fear and desperation of the smuggling routes with the indulgent luxuries of ski resorts?

Obama Want Us To Save Less, especially for Retirement

Obama was on TV today Oct. 13, 2008 saying he wants us to take $10,000 out of our 401(k) and tax deferred retirement savings tax free to help stimulate the economy.

Simultaneously, he wants stimulus to credit card, car loan and business loan companies to lend us more money.

Duh! Isn’t too much debt and lack of savings what got us into this mess?

Barry, the reason there are tax penalties on early withdrawals from 401(k) and other retirement plans are twofold:

(1)  We are supposed to accumulate our savings long term so the money is there when we retire.The tax penalty on early withdrawal is to prevent people from doing stupid things like stealing from their retirement for current pleasures. There is a concept called Deferred Gratification, but Barry wouldn’t know about it because his entire life has consisted of charities and taxpayers fulfilling his every need everey day of his life. Barry took a four month trip around the world after his sophomore year in college without ever having worked a day in his life. Barry went to Indonesia, Pakistan and Africa with his Two Pakistani Muslim friends who today control his Presidential campaign finance. Where did the money come from for his “Round the Muslim World” sophmore trip, and where does the money actually come from for his current campaign?

(2) All retirement accounts are rstricted to investments which help build the economy. Retirement accounts are either banking deposits, stocks and other instruments which supply capital to build the capitalistic economy. In case you have not noticed Barry, the government is taking a trillion dollars of taxpayer money to increase the capitalization of the same companies that will lose capital when people withdraw $10,000 from their retirement accounts.

So with one hand Barry will take money out of retirement capital investments, while the other hand uses tax payer dollars to inject capital into the companies from which the withdrawals come/

This is economic insanity. But if Barry has never been part of the economy, how can we expect him to know anything? I gues I am unfair to Barry for exposing his insane ignorance of the economy. More here

 

The Obama Bear Market: Why Smart Investors Are Dumping Everything Before Obama Gets Elected

Yes, there was a credit crisis (which is separate from the stock market), but government announced effective plans to fix it. So why did the stock market crash afterwards?

There are four big reasons why smart investors are causing a stock bear market crash by dumping all their US stocks before Obama becomes President:

1. If by some chance, despite all the burdens listed below that Barry will place on companies, if you still manage to sell a stock for a profit, Barry will double the tax you pay on capital gains.

Therefore, smart investors who had any profits on stocks sold their stocks as soon as the polls turned in Barry’s favor, preferring to pay a smaller current capital gains tax today instead of Barry’s higher tax tomorrow. Even Kelsey Grammer, Frasier, was on TV saying he sold all his stocks as soon as the polls turned in favor of Obama. Don’t believe me? Look at the polling history. The week that McCain’s post-convention lead evaporated and Obama took the lead, the market crash began.

2.   Obama made a deal with labor unions to eliminate secret ballots when voting on whether or not to unionize. Also Barry will make the Union Steward the guy who walks up to you and collects your vote in front of him, so they can destroy your car in the parking lots if you vote against the union. This means all businesses will become unionized, further driving up costs, so you will pay a higher price for everything, yes EVERYTHING, and making it even harder for US companies to compete abroad. SO IMPORTS WILL INCREASE, AND EXPORTS AND JOBS WILL GO DOWN.

3. Obama is going to increase income and other taxes on business and eliminate all the loopholes, increasing companies’ costs and further decreasing companies’ ability to compete abroad.

4. Health care. Obama wants all health coverage to equal the health care that Congress has. Barry is such a stupid doofus that he does not realize that the insurance companies give Congress excellent coverage for very low premiums AS A BRIBE!!!! repeat as a bribe!!!

When the insurance companies have to include all those rich benefits in policies for everybody, the insurance companies will have to increase the premiums to cover the high costs, plus profit, plus commissions, plus the bribes/payoffs to Barry and the Democratic party for giving such a windfall proft to the insurance companies. And I guarantee you that Barry will not call for a windfall profits tax on the insurance companies who got him elected.

This will increase already out of control health costs by 30 percent, putting US companies at an even bigger disadvantage competing with foreign companies who have no health care costs at all, zero, because other countries pay socialized health care nationally, without stupidly putting the burden on employers. 

All four of these points add greatly, hugely to the costs of running every business in America, so every business will be forced to increase prices to pay for all of Barry’s added costs. That is called inflation. Barry says he will not increase taxes on moderate income families, but his four points above will make everything you buy cost more. Much more.

And given all of the above, there is no reason to own stocks in American Companies.

Obama killed the stock market.

Obama caused the stock market crash and long term bear market.

Obama will kill the US economy.

Barack will give us Change instead of our 401k’s. Pocket change instead of retirement savings.

I found this one on Obama’s secret executive experience: http://ngoldfarb.wordpress.com

Both Obama and McCain Idiots Support Bloated, Larger Gigantic Bailout

The original bailout was ONLY $700 billion, and everyone with a brain warned that it would grow because there are $5 trillion of mortgages larger than the value of the underlying homes.

Now the Senate is trying to “IMPROVE” the bill. This why we need a Constitutional Amendment banning anyone who has ever been a Senator from becoming President.  Being a Senator permanently, irreversibly damages your mind. Oh, both candidates are Senators, so we are in real trouble because they are Senators and their minds have been permanently infected with “SENATORITIS” the chronic, terminal disease closely related to Alzheimer’s.

Because they have SENATORITIS, both candidates support the IMPROVED Senate version of the bailout. The IMPROVED Senate bill is what Senators think will make it more attractive to more voters and therefore more likely to pass. It proves the old joke that a Hippopotamus is a mouse designed by Congress.

The Senators are totally oblivious to the complaints voiced by 95% of voters that the original bill will (1) cause inflation, (2) bust the budget, (3) cause the value of the dollar to drop, creating even higher gasoline prices, (4) require a huge tax increase.

The SENATORITIS “improved” the bill by ADDING Senator Obama’s (of course the moron is a Senator) (1) $64 billion earmark for ACORN and LA RAZA, (2) $40 billion to repeal the AMT, and (3) $68 billion in alternative energy tax credits. These increases total $172 billion more costs to the taxpayers.

The $17 billion is $1,700 per household increase, and raises the total bailout to more than $8,720 per household, and it is still growing. It will end up costing way more.

These increases/improvements total $172 billion in additional tax increases required to pay for them.

These increases/improvements total $172 billion of inflationary pressure on our rapidly inflating currency, wiping out the value of our savings and investments.

These increases/improvements total $172 billion in the budget deficit that we have to borrow from China.

These increases/improvements total $172 billion that are being passed with no hearings open to the public, with no voice of the people. THE BASTARDS ARE RAMMING THIS DOWN OUR THROAT IN TOTAL DISREGARD OF THE EMAILS AND PHONECALLS FROM THE VOTERS OPPSING EVERY FORM OF THE BAILOUT.

The bailout has grown from $700 billion to $872 billion in less than one week. Imagine what it will really cost? Congress just increased the limit on our debt ceiling by more than twice the size of the bailout, indicating that the bastards intend to spend double the amount of the bailout.

Stop this destruction of America by clicking on the following link, enter your zip code in the box on the left to find your Senator, and cut and paste the following message into the message box to both of your Senators:

We do not want any form of mortgage bailout, no matter how much you increase it, change it or rename it. Repeal the CRA Community Reinvestment Act and abolish Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the FHA. NO BAILOUT OF ANY KIND! NO BANKRUPTCY JUDGES REWRITING MORTGAGES. No assistance to freeloaders who got a house for no money down and won’t pay their mortgages. No cash to cities to buy foreclosed homes. NOTHING! Let the FDIC and Fed take over failed banks and eliminate mark to market, but no government interference in the working of the free markets, or we will impeach you! Got it? We mean it!

THE LINK   http://congressorg.capwiz.com/congressorg/directory/congdir.tt

 

Bill Clinton Passed CRAp, Hillary and Kerry Want to Wipe Up After Him

Bill Clinton passed the Community Reinvestment Act or CRA although it really was CRAp. Clinton’s law says banks must make a percentage of their mortgages to “nontraditional” homebuyers, or people who could never and should never get a mortgage. You know, the ACORN crowd. Billy said banks could get a commission for writing CRAp mortgages and selling them to Fannie Mae. By selling the CRAp, the banks no longer had any risk. Let a banker earn unlimited, risk free  commissions writing CRAp, and you get where we are today.

All the toxic assets that today’s bailout plan wants to buy are nothing but big packages of Bill Clinton’s CRAp.

As soon as Congress rejected bailing out Bill’s CRAp, Hillary Clinton and John Kerry (two who lost any chance at being President and are now mad at the American people for not choosing them) announced that they would revive the bailout in the Senate, hoping that if the Senate passed it, they could twist enough arms in the House to ram it through.

Actually, Hillary Clinton and John Kerry want to ram it up our A**es, with even higher tax increases than even Barry O wants, a weak dollar (which takes more dollars to buy oil – $10 a gallon gas), and inflation that will raise the price of bread to $20 a loaf. See the truth at http://ngoldfarb.wordpress.com